movementaIn dev
Peronace Performance Coaching

About movementa

movementa is a performance lab for athletes. It pairs evidence-based mental-performance protocols with movement analysis — climbing being the flagship computer-vision module — so what gets measured in the field and what gets trained off it sit inside one coherent framework, across disciplines.

1. The five performance factors

We anchor our model on Memmert's (2013) framework of the five performance factors in sport: Constitution shapes the four interacting downstream factors — Technique, Tactics, Fitness, and Cognition. None of them produces output on its own; each arrow in the diagram below represents a real interaction we can train, measure, or impair.

ConstitutionTechniqueTacticsFitnessCognition
The five performance factors in sport (adapted from Memmert, 2013).

Adapted from Memmert (2013), in Memmert & Raab (Eds.), Sportspsychologie.

For example, in climbing Technique and Fitness are visible — they're what video, force plates and hangboards measure. Tactics and Cognition are largely invisible, yet they decide whether a trained body can deliver under pressure.

Movementa's purpose is to make those two invisible factors visible, trainable, and trackable alongside the physical ones.

2. Why mental performance is non-optional

Cognitive fitness (attention, working memory, decision-making, motor planning) and emotional regulation (anxiety, arousal, self-compassion, appraisal) are not "soft" addenda to physical training — they are throughput multipliers. Empirically, mental-performance interventions in elite sport produce small-to-moderate improvements that compound over a season (Lochbaum et al., 2022; Brown & Fletcher, 2017).

In the case of climbing, for example:

"psychological aspects such as problem-solving ability, movement sequence recall, route finding, self-efficacy and stress management may be better predictors of climbing performance than physiological or biomechanical parameters (e.g., Giles et al., 2006; MacLeod et al., 2007; Morrison & Schöffl, 2007)."
— Sanchez, X., Henz, J., Martha, C., & Medernach, J. (2024). Psychological Aspects of Elite Performance in New Olympic Disciplines: The Case of Climbing. The Inquisive Mind / Special Issue on Sport Psychology. ⟨hal-04908769⟩

On a single climb, this shows up concretely:

  • Beta retention draws on visuospatial working memory (Boschker et al., 2002).
  • Coarticulation of moves depends on motor planning depth and chunking — a cognitive resource.
  • Pacing and rest selection are intertemporal decisions under fatigue (delay discounting).
  • Choke resistance at the crux depends on attentional focus and appraisal of demands vs. resources.

3. The competition arc — three phases movementa covers end-to-end

Pre-competition preparation

Before the season or session: IZOF profiling (Hanin) to find your individual zone of optimal functioning, MAC training (Mindfulness-Acceptance-Commitment; Gardner & Moore, 2007; Josefsson et al., 2019) for attentional control, grit and self-compassion baselining (Duckworth, 2007; Neff, 2003), Brain Endurance Training (Marcora) to inoculate against mental fatigue, and visualisation / beta memorisation drills. Sleep architecture and voice/HR biomarkers calibrate readiness.

In-competition — including choke avoidance

In the moments before and during the climb: a CSAI-2R check-in (Cox, Martens & Russell, 2003; revised from Martens, Vealey & Burton, 1990) flags whether cognitive anxiety, somatic anxiety, or low self-confidence is the limiter; the Challenge vs Threat appraisal (Blascovich & Mendes, 2000; Jones et al., 2009 TCTSA) gates entry — if resources don't meet demands, a 90-second resource-activation reframe runs before you step on. Coping-Effectiveness Training (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984) and thought-probe mid-attempt protocols address the well-documented choking mechanism (Beilock & Carr, 2001): under pressure, attention shifts inward to skill execution, disrupting automaticity. movementa's protocols pull attention back outward onto task-relevant cues.

Recovery and consolidation

Post-session: perceived-performance check-in, self-compassion break (Neff & Germer), sleep architecture tracking, rPPG heart-rate variability and voice biomarker stress recovery (Boersma, 1993; Verkruysse et al., 2008; Elgendi, 2012). The dashboard turns repeated check-ins and performance data into trends.

4. How the app's activities map onto the framework

Memmert factormovementa activities
FitnessSleep quality and impact · photoplethysmography heart rate · brain endurance training · recovery trends
CognitionSpatial memory training that can have broad cognitive transfer · impulsivity assessment · information sampling assessment · thought probes · self-compassion exercises
ConstitutionIndividual Zone of Optimal Function · anthropometrics · grit assessment
Technique & Tactics climbing video analysis moduleClimb video analysis · kinematics (CCI, geometric entropy, path length) · stick-figure overlays · side-by-side comparison · route-aligned epoch comparison · beta planning and deployment (in progress)

5. References

The full evidence base — every protocol, instrument and citation used across the app — lives in the Methods & sources section below. Key foundational references for this page:

  • Memmert, D. (2013). The five performance factors in sport. In Sportpsychologie.
  • Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2001). On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure? JEP: General, 130(4), 701–725.
  • Blascovich, J., & Mendes, W. B. (2000). Challenge and threat appraisals: The role of affective cues. In Feeling and Thinking.
  • Jones, M., Meijen, C., McCarthy, P. J., & Sheffield, D. (2009). A Theory of Challenge and Threat States in Athletes. Int. Rev. Sport & Exercise Psychology, 2(2).
  • Martens, R., Vealey, R. S., & Burton, D. (1990). Competitive Anxiety in Sport (CSAI-2).
  • Cox, R. H., Martens, M. P., & Russell, W. D. (2003). Measuring anxiety in athletics: the revised Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2. J. Sport & Exerc. Psychol., 25(4), 519–533.
  • Terry, P. C., & Munro, A. (2008). Psychometric re-evaluation of the revised version of the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2. Proc. 43rd APS Annual Conference.
  • Gardner, F. L., & Moore, Z. E. (2007). The Psychology of Enhancing Human Performance: MAC Approach.
  • Josefsson, T., et al. (2019). MAC vs PST for elite athletes (RCT). JSPA, 11(2).
  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping.
  • Neff, K. D. (2003). Self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2(2).
  • Duckworth, A. L., et al. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. JPSP, 92(6).
  • Hanin, Y. L. (2000). Emotions in Sport (IZOF).
  • Boschker, M. S. J., Bakker, F. C., & Michaels, C. F. (2002). Memory for the functional characteristics of climbing walls. JMB, 34(1).
  • Corsi, P. M. (1972). Human memory and the medial temporal region of the brain. (Doctoral dissertation, McGill).
  • Brown, D. J., & Fletcher, D. (2017). Effects of psychological and psychosocial interventions on sport performance: meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 47.
  • Lochbaum, M., et al. (2022). Sport psychology and performance meta-analyses: A systematic review. PLOS ONE.
  • Sanchez, X., Henz, J., Martha, C., & Medernach, J. (2024). Psychological Aspects of Elite Performance in New Olympic Disciplines: The Case of Climbing. The Inquisive Mind / Special Issue on Sport Psychology. ⟨hal-04908769⟩

6. Methods & sources

The full evidence base for every activity, metric and instrument surfaced across the app.

Methods & sources

What's actually under the hood, organised by theme so you can see which evidence base supports each part of the app.

Session check-ins, hydration & sport-specific reflection

Instruments used by the Mental Performance Hub's post-session check-ins, hydration self-assessment, and sport-specific reflection cards.

Wearables & activity import

File formats, HRV validity, and chest-strap accuracy behind the Wearable Import card.

Climbing video analysis — kinematics & expert-rater scoring

Primary sources underpinning the coarticulation, geometric-entropy and CM-PAT metrics shown on each session report.

Climbing video analysis — pose, hold detection & technique scoring

Computer-vision backbones, datasets and scoring frameworks behind the per-session movement scores.

Adaptive / paraclimbing

Category taxonomy used to tailor feedback for adaptive athletes.

Brain endurance & cognitive-load training

Two-task cognitive protocols behind the Skills hub Brain Endurance Training (BET).

Mental performance — anxiety, confidence & self-compassion

Validated inventories and interventions in the Mental Performance and Self-compassion modules.

Mindfulness, acceptance & values (MAC)

Mindfulness-Acceptance-Commitment protocol and its acceptance-and-commitment foundations in the MAC Training module.

Coping, appraisal & challenge–threat states

Transactional coping and biopsychosocial challenge/threat models behind the CET and Challenge–Threat Appraisal modules.

Interoception & paced breathing

Resonance-frequency breathing and interoceptive awareness scaffolding in the Interoception Training module.

Sleep & decision-making

Sleep architecture self-report and the link from sleep loss to risky decision-making (Sleep Architecture + Decision Latency Gate).

Decision-making — delay discounting & mouse-tracking

Mouse-tracked intertemporal choice task in Skills (Delay Discounting).

Reflection–impulsivity — information sampling

Probabilistic information-sampling task with effort cost (Skills · Information Sampling).

Working memory & beta memorisation

Visuo-spatial working memory paradigms behind Beta Memory and Motion Beta Memory.

Recovery, stress & biometrics

Subjective recovery scales and physiological signal extraction for the check-in suite.

Spatial cognition & decision-making (SODT-R)

Dynamic spatial-orientation task adapted into the Skills hub.

Grit & long-term motivation

Trait-grit instrument and climbing-specific evidence behind the Grit module.